
(
Keith Allison)
By: Greg PayneAllow me to briefly tip my hat to my good friend Matt for presenting me with the idea for the following article. It's amazing at the subject matter you don't think of until you finally have a very basic chat with your buddies about the state of your team.
Considering how anemic the Celtics' bench seemingly became last season, I think it's safe to say we were all essentially thrilled when we learned that we'd be adding Rasheed Wallace and Marquis Daniels and that we were able to retain Glen Davis. Nothing but good news, right?
Well, a talented group of guys doesn't always equate to a successful group of guys. Just ask the 2003-2004 Los Angeles Lakers who brought in Gary Payton and Karl Malone. According to Phil Jackson's book regarding that season, it wasn't always sunshine and rainbows.
I suppose I should clarify who I believe will comprise our bench this season. I absolutely expect to see a second unit made up of Eddie House, Marquis Daniels, Glen Davis, Rasheed Wallace and Player X. But for the sake of the article, I'm going to stick with those four guys.
I think it's also fair to say that the above four players are coming off of very respectable seasons. Some of the guys even had career years in specific categories. For example, Marquis Daniels' 13.6 ppg mark was a career-high. The same goes for Eddie House's three-point field goal percentage (.444), which ended up setting a Celtics' single season record. And then there's Glen Davis, who's scintillating playoff performance was memorable in a multitude of ways.
Then, we come to Rasheed Wallace, whose 12.0 ppg mark was the second lowest of his career, behind only his rookie season mark of 10.1 ppg. But to me, Wallace is more like an old school movie series that's about to get rebooted with a 230 million dollar budget to get it off the ground. I honestly believe that things were so shaky in Detroit last season that his statistics were more of a direct result of the situation, as opposed to his own performances. I'm not saying coming to a game not fully ready to compete is acceptable, but I don't expect problems like that here, where we have a more stable situation compared to what Detroit faced last season.
Speaking of last season, let me throw some stats out:
Wallace: 66 games/32.2 mpg/ 720 FGA/ 10.9 FGA per game/ 12.0 ppg
Daniels: 54 games/ 31.5 mpg/ 689 FGA/ 12.7 FGA per game/ 13.6 ppg
House: 81 games/ 18.3 mpg/ 560 FGA/ 6.9 FGA per game/ 8.5 ppg
Davis: 76 games/ 21.5 mpg/ 450 FGA/ 5.9 FGA per game/ 7.0 ppg
* Davis playoff averages: 14 games/ 36.4 mpg/ 175 FGA/ 12.5 FGA per game/ 15.8 ppg
I included Davis's playoff numbers only because I feel it's safe to say we saw two different versions of Davis: Pre-Kevin Garnett injury and post-Kevin Garnett injury.
So, can we conclude anything from those stats? Well, one thing that immediately jumps out at me is that none of these players played in all 82 regular season games last year, but let's not dwell on that. Only the cynics bring up that stat.
I think one question we absolutely have to ask ourselves is: Will each guy want to get his? Will Davis, fresh off not securing the mid-level exception he so aggressively coveted, be looking to pad his stats for the next two seasons? Will he be inclined to fill a bench role? Or now that he's "arrived" will we see some flares of angst at a possible lack of playing time and field goal attempts?
And what about House? Isn't he at his best when he's seemingly free to shoot whenever the shot is there for him? Will he now have more restrictions in place with more talented players beside him who are capable of scoring for themselves? Will he be looking to eclipse that .444 mark from three-point nation from last season, and if so, how many shots will that require?
Then we come to Marquis Daniels - the man we still know so little about. Sure we can glance at the stats, but we might not yet understand the subtle nuances he plays with, which can actually have a profound impact on his performance. Realistically it's safe to say he will not be topping his career scoring average from last season, especially if the coaching staff aims for the bench to play as a unit, as opposed to running the offense through one or two specific players. But his ability to slash through the lane could realistically open things up on the perimeter for House or Wallace or even Davis, if he wishes to shoot that 15-footer of his.
As for Wallace, we know about his versatility and his basketball I.Q., but will he fit into our truly important second unit scheme? With Doc Rivers and co. looking to restrict Kevin Garnett's minutes this season in order to avoid any type of injury, Wallace could very well be looking at over 20 minutes of action every night. Whether he'll accept such a role is a whole other matter, and the
ESPN guys aren't sure he can hack it:
The C's need big things from Sheed to contend for a title; many of our voters don't expect him to deliver. His production has plateaued during the past three seasons, and he continues to make a negative impact with his technicals. Playing alongside KG might help Sheed stay interested, but will Wallace embrace his role off the bench for 82 games?
The starting five that won the championship back in '08 remains in tact, and with a well full of championship experience, it's somewhat difficult to believe KG or Paul Pierce or Doc will let any of the newcomers jeopardize their overall goals. In my opinion, Ubuntu is too strong for any of that these days. And, as in recent years has been the trend, the new guys are here to win, not to complain. I for one think it will work. Even when KG went down last season, the team didn't come apart by the strings. They remained in tact, even as their body of talent took a straight shot to the ribs. I think we can expect the same team chemistry this season, just with some louder personalities leading the way. Let's just figure out this backup point guard business now.
Stay Tuned.